Anteater vs Inventory Management with Sheets™

Anteater edges out Inventory Management with Sheets™ on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

On pricing, Inventory Management with Sheets™ offers a free tier (Free of charge with paid features) while Anteater starts at Not available. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Anteater; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Inventory Management with Sheets™'s 59-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Anteater's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Anteater or Inventory Management with Sheets™ cheaper?

Inventory Management with Sheets™ is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free of charge with paid features). Anteater starts at Not available. Both publish their pricing on the Google Workspace Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Anteater or Inventory Management with Sheets™?

Anteater has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Inventory Management with Sheets™ (4.9★ from 59 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Anteater or Inventory Management with Sheets™?

Anteater holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Anteater or Inventory Management with Sheets™?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Inventory Management with Sheets™ has the deeper published review base (59 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Google Workspace Marketplace admins?

Anteater typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Inventory Management with Sheets™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Anteater and Inventory Management with Sheets™?

Migration support varies by app and category. Anteater and Inventory Management with Sheets™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Anteater" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.