Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Get an instant and comprehensive breakdown of any email thread without leaving Gmail™
| Adveronix | Email Meter for Gmail™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Adveronix | Email Meter for Gmail™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.4k | 239 |
| Active installs | 283,657+ | 334,886+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge |
Based on the data on this page, Adveronix is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.9★ vs Email Meter for Gmail™'s 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Adveronix at Free of charge with paid features, Email Meter for Gmail™ at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Adveronix has the larger user base (1,389 reviews vs 239), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Email Meter for Gmail™'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Adveronix; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Email Meter for Gmail™'s 239-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Adveronix's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Adveronix audit • Email Meter for Gmail™ audit
Both Adveronix and Email Meter for Gmail™ offer paid plans only. Adveronix starts at Free of charge with paid features; Email Meter for Gmail™ starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Adveronix has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 1,389 reviews) compared to Email Meter for Gmail™ (4.3★ from 239 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Adveronix holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Adveronix has the deeper published review base (1,389 vs 239), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Adveronix typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,389 reviews). Email Meter for Gmail™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (239 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Adveronix and Email Meter for Gmail™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Email Meter for Gmail™" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
