| Achievers | Org Chart - Best Chart Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Organizational chart builder with instant Google Workspace sync. You can create multiple org charts and the org chart core.
| Metric | Achievers | Org Chart - Best Chart Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 9 | ★ 97 |
| Active installs | 579,671+ | 913,086+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge with paid features |
Based on the data on this page, Achievers is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.9★ vs Org Chart - Best Chart Builder's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Achievers at Free of charge, Org Chart - Best Chart Builder at Free of charge with paid features. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Achievers; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Org Chart - Best Chart Builder's 97-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Achievers's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Achievers audit • Org Chart - Best Chart Builder audit
Both Achievers and Org Chart - Best Chart Builder offer paid plans only. Achievers starts at Free of charge; Org Chart - Best Chart Builder starts at Free of charge with paid features. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Achievers has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 9 reviews) compared to Org Chart - Best Chart Builder (3.9★ from 97 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Achievers holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Org Chart - Best Chart Builder has the deeper published review base (97 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Achievers typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). Org Chart - Best Chart Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (97 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Achievers and Org Chart - Best Chart Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Achievers" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.