Time in Status vs Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence

Time in Status and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: Time in Status at From $0/yr, Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the larger user base (799 reviews vs 207), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Time in Status's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Time in Status or Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence cheaper?

Both Time in Status and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence offer paid plans only. Time in Status starts at From $0/yr; Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Time in Status or Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence?

Time in Status (4.5★, 207 reviews) and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence (4.5★, 799 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Time in Status or Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence?

Time in Status holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Time in Status or Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence has the deeper published review base (799 vs 207), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Time in Status typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (207 reviews). Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (799 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Time in Status and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence?

Migration support varies by app and category. Time in Status and Gliffy Diagrams for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Time in Status" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.