Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Swanly | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 61 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 1,562+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking are evenly matched on rating (4.1★ vs 4.1★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 61), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | Swanly | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | #7192 | #199192 |
Both Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline starts at From $0/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline (4.1★, 61 reviews) and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★, 896 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.1★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 61), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (61 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Swanly: Portfolio Roadmaps Structure Gantt, Release Timeline" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.