HTML Macro for Confluence vs Rewind Backups for Confluence

HTML Macro for Confluence and Rewind Backups for Confluence are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr, Rewind Backups for Confluence at From $3/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is HTML Macro for Confluence or Rewind Backups for Confluence cheaper?

Both HTML Macro for Confluence and Rewind Backups for Confluence offer paid plans only. HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr; Rewind Backups for Confluence starts at From $3/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, HTML Macro for Confluence or Rewind Backups for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence (5.0★, 31 reviews) and Rewind Backups for Confluence (4.9★, 43 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose HTML Macro for Confluence or Rewind Backups for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, HTML Macro for Confluence or Rewind Backups for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Rewind Backups for Confluence has the deeper published review base (43 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

HTML Macro for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). Rewind Backups for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.