Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Jira and Jira Service Management approval management that lets teams design multi-step, multi-level approval processes with custom rules and conditions. Route by manager, role, group, or work field, and run steps in sequence or in parallel.
| Approval Path for Jira | Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Create branded, customizable sites that serve as the front door to Confluence. Engage users by welcoming them to well structured, themed and informative pages populated with Confluence content as well as Jira and JSM content if you wish.
| Metric | Approval Path for Jira | Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 26 | ★ 63 |
| Active installs | 260+ | 2,444+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $1/yr | From $3/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Approval Path for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Approval Path for Jira at From $1/yr vs Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) at From $3/yr (Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) is roughly 3.0x the entry-tier cost of Approval Path for Jira). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Approval Path for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s 63-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Approval Path for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Approval Path for Jira audit • Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) audit
| — |
| Keyword | Approval Path for Jira | Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) |
|---|---|---|
| time | #341 | Not ranked |
Both Approval Path for Jira and Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) offer paid plans only. Approval Path for Jira starts at From $1/yr; Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) starts at From $3/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Approval Path for Jira has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 26 reviews) compared to Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) (4.4★ from 63 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Approval Path for Jira holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) has the deeper published review base (63 vs 26), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Approval Path for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (63 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Approval Path for Jira and Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Approval Path for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.