Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking vs External Share for Confluence

Based on the data on this page, External Share for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing sits in similar territory: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr, External Share for Confluence at From $1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding.

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 46), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. External Share for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to External Share for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 896-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than External Share for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or External Share for Confluence cheaper?

Both Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking and External Share for Confluence offer paid plans only. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr; External Share for Confluence starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or External Share for Confluence?

External Share for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 46 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 896 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or External Share for Confluence?

External Share for Confluence holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or External Share for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 46), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). External Share for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (46 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.