Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
All-in-one app for Jira workflow automation. Top-selling & top-rated. Easily configure Jira workflows with an unmatched collection of point-and-click post functions, conditions and validators, or do almost anything with simple yet powerful scripting.
| Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Connect and query your SQL databases, and create dynamic BI reports right within Confluence. Query and display your SQL data as a table or dashboard. Connect your databases with a simple, form-based setup.
| Metric | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 534 | 29 |
| Active installs | 16,850+ | 1,065+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition)'s 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) at From $0/yr, SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the larger user base (534 reviews vs 29), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition)'s 29-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) audit • SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) audit
| Keyword | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #118 |
| form | Not ranked | #226 |
No tracked changes.
Both Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) offer paid plans only. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) starts at From $0/yr; SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 534 reviews) compared to SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) (4.5★ from 29 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the deeper published review base (534 vs 29), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (534 reviews). SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (29 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) and SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.