Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Connect and query your SQL databases, and create dynamic BI reports right within Confluence. Query and display your SQL data as a table or dashboard. Connect your databases with a simple, form-based setup.
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 29 |
| Active installs | 13,025+ | 1,065+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr, SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 29), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) audit
| Keyword | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #118 |
| form | Not ranked | #226 |
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★, 408 reviews) and SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) (4.5★, 29 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 29), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (29 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SQL for Confluence (Pro Edition)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.