Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create powerful, easy-to-use and secure diagrams. Top rated Jira diagramming solution since 2013
| draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Create structure inside Confluence to allow capturing of form data and build the foundation of your semantic wiki. Use form templates to create quick simple applications. Capture and organize form data to be edited and reported on at a later stage.
| Metric | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 350 | 124 |
| Active installs | 8,778+ | 1,337+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
draw.io Diagrams for Jira edges out Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence on rating (4.7★ vs 4.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams for Jira at From $0/yr, Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the larger user base (350 reviews vs 124), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence's 124-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: draw.io Diagrams for Jira audit • Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence audit
| Keyword | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| form | Not ranked | #4 |
| forms | Not ranked | #7 |
Both draw.io Diagrams for Jira and Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence offer paid plans only. draw.io Diagrams for Jira starts at From $0/yr; Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 350 reviews) compared to Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence (4.4★ from 124 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the deeper published review base (350 vs 124), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (350 reviews). Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (124 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. draw.io Diagrams for Jira and Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Scaffolding Forms & Templates for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.