Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking vs Connector for Google Drive & Confluence

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking edges out Connector for Google Drive & Confluence on rating (4.1★ vs 4.0★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 20), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Connector for Google Drive & Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Connector for Google Drive & Confluence's 20-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or Connector for Google Drive & Confluence?

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the higher average rating (4.1★ from 896 reviews) compared to Connector for Google Drive & Confluence (4.0★ from 20 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or Connector for Google Drive & Confluence?

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking holds the higher average rating (4.1★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking or Connector for Google Drive & Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 20), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). Connector for Google Drive & Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (20 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking and Connector for Google Drive & Confluence?

Migration support varies by app and category. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking and Connector for Google Drive & Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Connector for Google Drive & Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.