Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create powerful, easy-to-use and secure diagrams. Top rated Jira diagramming solution since 2013
| draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Connector for Google Drive & Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Connect to Google Drive and take collaboration to the next level with ease.
| Metric | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Connector for Google Drive & Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 350 | 20 |
| Active installs | 8,778+ | 93+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.7★ vs Connector for Google Drive & Confluence's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the larger user base (350 reviews vs 20), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Connector for Google Drive & Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Connector for Google Drive & Confluence's 20-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: draw.io Diagrams for Jira audit • Connector for Google Drive & Confluence audit
| Keyword | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Connector for Google Drive & Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #264 |
| form | Not ranked | #374 |
draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 350 reviews) compared to Connector for Google Drive & Confluence (4.0★ from 20 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the deeper published review base (350 vs 20), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (350 reviews). Connector for Google Drive & Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (20 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. draw.io Diagrams for Jira and Connector for Google Drive & Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Connector for Google Drive & Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.