HTML Macro for Confluence vs Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)

Based on the data on this page, HTML Macro for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr, Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) at From $3/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s 63-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is HTML Macro for Confluence or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) cheaper?

Both HTML Macro for Confluence and Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) offer paid plans only. HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr; Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) starts at From $3/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, HTML Macro for Confluence or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)?

HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) (4.4★ from 63 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose HTML Macro for Confluence or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)?

HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, HTML Macro for Confluence or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) has the deeper published review base (63 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.