Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Customize and automate Jira workflows with JMWE. Built for advanced, unlimited automation and smarter workflow control
| HTML Macro for Confluence | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
- Add custom HTML to Confluence pages - Use CSS and Javascript to enhance looks and functionality - Run code snippets - Embed external contents and web pages as Iframe
| Metric | HTML Macro for Confluence | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.0 ★ | 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 14 | ★ 517 |
| Active installs | 2,128+ | 17,614+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
HTML Macro for Confluence edges out Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) on rating (4.0★ vs 3.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has the larger user base (517 reviews vs 14), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. HTML Macro for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE)'s 517-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: HTML Macro for Confluence audit • Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) audit
| Keyword | HTML Macro for Confluence | Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #53 | Not ranked |
| form | #101 | Not ranked |
HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) (3.9★ from 517 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. HTML Macro for Confluence fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) has more onboarding documentation maturity (517 reviews vs 14), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
HTML Macro for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (14 reviews). Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (517 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. HTML Macro for Confluence and Jira Misc Workflow Extensions (JMWE) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from HTML Macro for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.