Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Gain deeper visibility into your teams’ tracked time efforts via a comprehensive financial overview, organized by individuals, teams and projects.
| Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo | Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Atlas CRM bridges work, documentation, and customer management by linking Jira issues and Jira Service Management requests to customers, sales, and interactions from Outlook & Gmail. Centralize everything for a complete 360° view of your customers.
| Metric | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo | Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 46 | ★ 80 |
| Active installs | 3,441+ | 1,564+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $1/yr | From $2/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
Based on the data on this page, Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.2★ vs Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing differs significantly: Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo at From $1/yr vs Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira at From $2/yr (Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira is roughly 2.0x the entry-tier cost of Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo's 46-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo audit • Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira audit
| Keyword | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo | Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #327 |
| form | Not ranked | #437 |
| time | #500 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo and Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira offer paid plans only. Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo starts at From $1/yr; Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira starts at From $2/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 80 reviews) compared to Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo (3.8★ from 46 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira has more onboarding documentation maturity (80 reviews vs 46), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (46 reviews). Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (80 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo and Atlas CRM - Customers and Sales in Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.