Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Core processes are the backbone of every organization. The Enterprise Version of the BPMN Modeler for Confluence lets you bind your processes together, build process nets and combine process information with other relevant organizational aspects.
| BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Gain deeper visibility into your teams’ tracked time efforts via a comprehensive financial overview, organized by individuals, teams and projects.
| Metric | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 46 |
| Active installs | 1,140+ | 3,166+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1.1/yr | ★ From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, BPMN Modeler Enterprise is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing sits in similar territory: BPMN Modeler Enterprise at From $1.1/yr, Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo at From $1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to BPMN Modeler Enterprise; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo's 46-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BPMN Modeler Enterprise's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BPMN Modeler Enterprise audit • Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo audit
| Keyword | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #500 |
Both BPMN Modeler Enterprise and Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo offer paid plans only. BPMN Modeler Enterprise starts at From $1.1/yr; Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 24 reviews) compared to Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo (3.8★ from 46 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo has the deeper published review base (46 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (46 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BPMN Modeler Enterprise and Financial Manager - Jira Project Cost Tracking | Tempo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BPMN Modeler Enterprise" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.