Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
🏆 JWT - the best rated & complete automation solution. Limitless customization of Jira workflows without the need to code
| Status Time Reports - Time in Status | Jira Workflow Toolbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Generate reports based on time in status or time in assignee, group statuses to get various cycle time and lead time reports
| Metric | Status Time Reports - Time in Status | Jira Workflow Toolbox |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 51 | ★ 534 |
| Active installs | 1,404+ | 5,112+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Jira Workflow Toolbox edges out Status Time Reports - Time in Status on rating (4.0★ vs 3.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Jira Workflow Toolbox has the larger user base (534 reviews vs 51), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Status Time Reports - Time in Status's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Jira Workflow Toolbox; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Status Time Reports - Time in Status's 51-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jira Workflow Toolbox's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Status Time Reports - Time in Status audit • Jira Workflow Toolbox audit
| Keyword | Status Time Reports - Time in Status | Jira Workflow Toolbox |
|---|---|---|
| time | #5 | Not ranked |
Jira Workflow Toolbox has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 534 reviews) compared to Status Time Reports - Time in Status (3.8★ from 51 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Status Time Reports - Time in Status fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Jira Workflow Toolbox is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Jira Workflow Toolbox has more onboarding documentation maturity (534 reviews vs 51), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Status Time Reports - Time in Status typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (51 reviews). Jira Workflow Toolbox aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (534 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Status Time Reports - Time in Status and Jira Workflow Toolbox both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Status Time Reports - Time in Status" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.