Side-by-side comparison
Generate custom table reports by first choosing the report columns and then grouping and summarizing the ones you want
- Add custom HTML to Confluence pages - Use CSS and Javascript to enhance looks and functionality - Run code snippets - Embed external contents and web pages as Iframe
| Metric | Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 33 | 31 |
| Active installs | 984+ | 2,327+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 |
On the measured data here, HTML Macro for Confluence leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Listed entry pricing: Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence audit • HTML Macro for Confluence audit
| Field | Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| 3 |
| Keyword | Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #54 |
| form | Not ranked | #98 |
Both Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence and HTML Macro for Confluence offer a free plan. Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence lists no paid plan with a published price; HTML Macro for Confluence lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence (4.9★ from 33 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (33 vs 31).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence has 33 published reviews; HTML Macro for Confluence has 31 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. Sum Up Reports for Jira & Confluence and HTML Macro for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from HTML Macro for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.