Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
- Add custom HTML to Confluence pages - Use CSS and Javascript to enhance looks and functionality - Run code snippets - Embed external contents and web pages as Iframe
| Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira | HTML Macro for Confluence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Easy access to the Home Directory, Database Console, and Last Log Viewer without having to use SSH or access your server directly. With this 3-in-1 tool you’re ready to troubleshoot any Jira challenge no matter where you are.
| Metric | Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 27 | ★ 31 |
| Active installs | 592+ | 2,327+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, HTML Macro for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira's 27-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira audit • HTML Macro for Confluence audit
| Keyword | Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira | HTML Macro for Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #54 |
| form | Not ranked | #98 |
| time | #325 | Not ranked |
HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira (4.6★ from 27 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. HTML Macro for Confluence has the deeper published review base (31 vs 27), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). HTML Macro for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira and HTML Macro for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.