Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Core processes are the backbone of every organization. The Enterprise Version of the BPMN Modeler for Confluence lets you bind your processes together, build process nets and combine process information with other relevant organizational aspects.
| BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Easy access to the Home Directory, Database Console, and Last Log Viewer without having to use SSH or access your server directly. With this 3-in-1 tool you’re ready to troubleshoot any Jira challenge no matter where you are.
| Metric | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 27 |
| Active installs | 1,140+ | 592+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1.1/yr | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, BPMN Modeler Enterprise is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to BPMN Modeler Enterprise; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira's 27-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BPMN Modeler Enterprise's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BPMN Modeler Enterprise audit • Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira audit
| — |
| Keyword | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #325 |
BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 24 reviews) compared to Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira (4.6★ from 27 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira has the deeper published review base (27 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BPMN Modeler Enterprise and Home Directory, Database & Log File Browser for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BPMN Modeler Enterprise" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.