Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Core processes are the backbone of every organization. The Enterprise Version of the BPMN Modeler for Confluence lets you bind your processes together, build process nets and combine process information with other relevant organizational aspects.
| BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 23 | ★ 892 |
| Active installs | 1,126+ | 28,392+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1.1/yr | ★ From $1/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
Based on the data on this page, BPMN Modeler Enterprise is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing sits in similar territory: BPMN Modeler Enterprise at From $1.1/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (892 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. BPMN Modeler Enterprise's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to BPMN Modeler Enterprise; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 892-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BPMN Modeler Enterprise's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BPMN Modeler Enterprise audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| Keyword | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #7 |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both BPMN Modeler Enterprise and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. BPMN Modeler Enterprise starts at From $1.1/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 23 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 892 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. BPMN Modeler Enterprise fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has more onboarding documentation maturity (892 reviews vs 23), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (23 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (892 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BPMN Modeler Enterprise and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BPMN Modeler Enterprise" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.