User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) vs HTML Macro for Confluence

HTML Macro for Confluence edges out User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) at From $0/yr, HTML Macro for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to HTML Macro for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync)'s 31-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HTML Macro for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) or HTML Macro for Confluence cheaper?

Both User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) and HTML Macro for Confluence offer paid plans only. User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) starts at From $0/yr; HTML Macro for Confluence starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) (4.8★ from 31 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) or HTML Macro for Confluence?

HTML Macro for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, User Profiles for Confluence (Microsoft Attributes Sync) or HTML Macro for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly, and the Atlassian Marketplace publishes no review base that would let us infer it for these two — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?