Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Edit long pages as separate text sections with the smart section grouping. Native Confluence editor in the pop-up form. Supreme user experience.
| InPlace Editor for Confluence | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Aha! is the world's #1 product roadmap software. Do your product planning in Aha! and push features to Jira. Get updates in real-time. Integrate for free to get your product mojo back (works with On-demand and On-prem). You need a paid Aha! account.
| Metric | InPlace Editor for Confluence | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 357 |
| Active installs | 142+ | 1,651+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Aha! Roadmaps for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.9★ vs InPlace Editor for Confluence's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the larger user base (357 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. InPlace Editor for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Aha! Roadmaps for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — InPlace Editor for Confluence's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aha! Roadmaps for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: InPlace Editor for Confluence audit • Aha! Roadmaps for Jira audit
| Keyword | InPlace Editor for Confluence | Aha! Roadmaps for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #65 | Not ranked |
| form | #131 | Not ranked |
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 357 reviews) compared to InPlace Editor for Confluence (4.5★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Aha! Roadmaps for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Aha! Roadmaps for Jira has the deeper published review base (357 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
InPlace Editor for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). Aha! Roadmaps for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (357 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. InPlace Editor for Confluence and Aha! Roadmaps for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from InPlace Editor for Confluence" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.