Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Connect Jira to any external data source: SQL databases, LDAP directories, CRMs and more. Elements Connect is the all-in-one connector that display the right data directly in your issues, so your teams stop wasting time hunting for information.
| Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Metric | Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 169 | ★ 896 |
| Active installs | 2,681+ | 26,977+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.7★ vs Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) at From $0/yr, Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 169), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 896-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) audit • Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit
| — |
| Keyword | Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #7 |
| forms | #223 | Not ranked |
| form | #335 | Not ranked |
Both Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking offer paid plans only. Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) starts at From $0/yr; Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 169 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 896 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 169), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (169 reviews). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) and Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.