Time to SLA vs Great Gadgets for Jira Cloud (Agile Charts Reports KPIs)

Based on the data on this page, Time to SLA is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.8★ vs Great Gadgets for Jira Cloud (Agile Charts Reports KPIs)'s 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Great Gadgets for Jira Cloud (Agile Charts Reports KPIs) at From $0/yr, Time to SLA at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Time to SLA has the larger user base (233 reviews vs 49), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Great Gadgets for Jira Cloud (Agile Charts Reports KPIs)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Time to SLA; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Great Gadgets for Jira Cloud (Agile Charts Reports KPIs)'s 49-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Time to SLA's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Great Gadgets for Jira Cloud (Agile Charts Reports KPIs) audit • Time to SLA audit

• Browse the atlassian compare hub
• Browse all atlassian apps
• Compare metrics glossary