Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
This plugin will allow you to keep track of the time spent by your team members. Can't find an easy way to figure out where the time was logged? This plugin will allow you to track the time being spent by the members of your team in a given period.
| Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets | Time in Status | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Jira productivity reports: time in status, cycle time, lead time and transitions between statuses, sprint performance report
| Metric | Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets | Time in Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 101 | ★ 207 |
| Active installs | 5,391+ | 5,378+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets and Time in Status are evenly matched on rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets at From $0/yr, Time in Status at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Time in Status has the larger user base (207 reviews vs 101), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets audit • Time in Status audit
| Keyword | Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets | Time in Status |
|---|---|---|
| time | #2 | #1 |
Both Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets and Time in Status offer paid plans only. Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets starts at From $0/yr; Time in Status starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets (4.5★, 101 reviews) and Time in Status (4.5★, 207 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Time in Status holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Time in Status has the deeper published review base (207 vs 101), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (101 reviews). Time in Status typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (207 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets and Time in Status both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.