Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
This plugin will allow you to keep track of the time spent by your team members. Can't find an easy way to figure out where the time was logged? This plugin will allow you to track the time being spent by the members of your team in a given period.
| Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets | Time to SLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Manages your SLAs within Jira. Simply define SLAs to see a countdown to target date according to SLA. Configure notifiers to get notified if the issue is close to critical time or just after the breach.
| Metric | Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets | Time to SLA |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 101 | ★ 237 |
| Active installs | 5,396+ | 3,413+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Time to SLA is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets at From $0/yr, Time to SLA at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Time to SLA has the larger user base (237 reviews vs 101), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Time to SLA; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets's 101-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Time to SLA's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets audit • Time to SLA audit
| Keyword | Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets | Time to SLA |
|---|---|---|
| time | #2 | #3 |
Both Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets and Time to SLA offer paid plans only. Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets starts at From $0/yr; Time to SLA starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Time to SLA has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 237 reviews) compared to Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets (4.5★ from 101 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Time to SLA holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Time to SLA has the deeper published review base (237 vs 101), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (101 reviews). Time to SLA typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (237 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets and Time to SLA both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Worklogs - Time Tracking, Time Reports, Timesheets" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.