| Mria CRM | QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira provides tools that help you manage the testing in your projects. Define test steps directly in the Jira issues so that everyone in your team shares a common understanding of what needs to be done.
| Metric | Mria CRM | QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 56 |
| Active installs | 338+ | 1,555+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $2/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Mria CRM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Mria CRM at From $2/yr, QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Mria CRM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira's 56-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mria CRM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mria CRM audit • QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira audit
| Keyword | Mria CRM | QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #336 |
| form | Not ranked | #448 |
Both Mria CRM and QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira offer paid plans only. Mria CRM starts at From $2/yr; QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mria CRM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira (4.6★ from 56 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mria CRM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira has the deeper published review base (56 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mria CRM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (56 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mria CRM and QAlity Plus - Test Management for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mria CRM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.