Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Resource planning dashboard with calendar timelines to schedule Jira tasks, epics & initiatives to team and people. Show a capacity plan for your advanced roadmaps. Generate Timesheets & Reports, export Jira schedule into Outlook & Google Calendar.
| Activity Timeline | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Core processes are the backbone of every organization. The Enterprise Version of the BPMN Modeler for Confluence lets you bind your processes together, build process nets and combine process information with other relevant organizational aspects.
| Metric | Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking | BPMN Modeler Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 121 | 24 |
| Active installs | 3,705+ | 1,140+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $1/yr | From $1.1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, BPMN Modeler Enterprise is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing sits in similar territory: Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking at From $1/yr, BPMN Modeler Enterprise at From $1.1/yr (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding.
Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking has the larger user base (121 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. BPMN Modeler Enterprise's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to BPMN Modeler Enterprise; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking's 121-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BPMN Modeler Enterprise's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking audit • BPMN Modeler Enterprise audit
| — |
| Keyword | Activity Timeline | BPMN Modeler Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| time | #17 | Not ranked |
Both Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking and BPMN Modeler Enterprise offer paid plans only. Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr; BPMN Modeler Enterprise starts at From $1.1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 24 reviews) compared to Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking (4.7★ from 121 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (121 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (121 reviews). BPMN Modeler Enterprise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Activity Timeline: Resource Capacity Planning, Time Tracking and BPMN Modeler Enterprise both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BPMN Modeler Enterprise" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.