Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Portfolio & project management solution to view your work across any Jira projects and teams, all in one place.
| Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Refined Toolkit is a Confluence app that includes a bundle of handy UI elements: Activity Stream macro Button macro Child pages macro Expand macro News macro Page tree macro Panel macro Numbered List macro Tab macro
| Metric | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 408 | 35 |
| Active installs | 13,025+ | 3,349+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) edges out Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM on rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM at From $1/yr, Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the larger user base (408 reviews vs 35), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros); mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM's 408-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM audit • Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) audit
| Keyword | Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM | Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) |
|---|---|---|
| form | Not ranked | #59 |
Both Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) offer paid plans only. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM starts at From $1/yr; Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 35 reviews) compared to Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM (4.5★ from 408 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM has the deeper published review base (408 vs 35), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (408 reviews). Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (35 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Structure by Tempo - Jira Portfolio Management PPM and Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Refined Macro Toolkit (Content Formatting Macros)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.