Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Use templates to create issues (subtasks, epics, linked) automatically or manually. Update issues with templates manually or automatically. Automate transitions for parent or child issues. Automation on status changes, issue creation or field updates
| STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) | BPMN Modeler Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Core processes are the backbone of every organization. The Enterprise Version of the BPMN Modeler for Confluence lets you bind your processes together, build process nets and combine process information with other relevant organizational aspects.
| Metric | STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) | BPMN Modeler Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 21 | ★ 24 |
| Active installs | 179+ | 1,140+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $1.1/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, BPMN Modeler Enterprise is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition)'s 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) at From $0/yr, BPMN Modeler Enterprise at From $1.1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to BPMN Modeler Enterprise; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition)'s 21-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than BPMN Modeler Enterprise's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) audit • BPMN Modeler Enterprise audit
| — |
Both STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) and BPMN Modeler Enterprise offer paid plans only. STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) starts at From $0/yr; BPMN Modeler Enterprise starts at From $1.1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 24 reviews) compared to STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) (4.6★ from 21 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
BPMN Modeler Enterprise holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. BPMN Modeler Enterprise has the deeper published review base (24 vs 21), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (21 reviews). BPMN Modeler Enterprise typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition) and BPMN Modeler Enterprise both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from STM Issue Templates (auto & manual create/update/transition)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.