Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Bring visual thinking into Confluence and structured documentation into Miro. Stay in sync, make faster product decisions, and share access in a secure way.
| Miro Embed for Confluence | Rich Text Gadget for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Jira dashboards can end up a confusing mix of graphs, charts and tables. Place rich text on your dashboard to provide additional information and clarity to users.
| Metric | Miro Embed for Confluence | Rich Text Gadget for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 3.6 ★ | 3.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 76 | 62 |
| Active installs | 19,825+ | 7,443+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Miro Embed for Confluence is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 3.6★ vs Rich Text Gadget for Jira's 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Miro Embed for Confluence at Free, Rich Text Gadget for Jira at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Miro Embed for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Rich Text Gadget for Jira's 62-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Miro Embed for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Miro Embed for Confluence audit • Rich Text Gadget for Jira audit
Both Miro Embed for Confluence and Rich Text Gadget for Jira offer paid plans only. Miro Embed for Confluence starts at Free; Rich Text Gadget for Jira starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Miro Embed for Confluence has the higher average rating (3.6★ from 76 reviews) compared to Rich Text Gadget for Jira (3.3★ from 62 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Miro Embed for Confluence holds the higher average rating (3.6★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Miro Embed for Confluence has the deeper published review base (76 vs 62), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Miro Embed for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (76 reviews). Rich Text Gadget for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (62 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Miro Embed for Confluence and Rich Text Gadget for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Rich Text Gadget for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.