Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
ScriptRunner is the top scripting, automation and customisation app: Automate workflows, build custom fields and integrations with Groovy scripts and enhanced JQL. Execute admin and workflow functions without having to write a complete add-on.
| ScriptRunner for Jira | Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
Connect Jira to any external data source: SQL databases, LDAP directories, CRMs and more. Elements Connect is the all-in-one connector that display the right data directly in your issues, so your teams stop wasting time hunting for information.
| Metric | ScriptRunner for Jira | Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 822 | 169 |
| Active installs | 35,165+ | 2,664+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
ScriptRunner for Jira and Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) are evenly matched on rating (4.6★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: ScriptRunner for Jira at From $0/yr, Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
ScriptRunner for Jira has the larger user base (822 reviews vs 169), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ScriptRunner for Jira audit • Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) audit
| — |
| Keyword | ScriptRunner for Jira | Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #106 | #223 |
| form | #213 | #335 |
Both ScriptRunner for Jira and Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) offer paid plans only. ScriptRunner for Jira starts at From $0/yr; Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ScriptRunner for Jira (4.6★, 822 reviews) and Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) (4.7★, 169 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ScriptRunner for Jira has the deeper published review base (822 vs 169), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ScriptRunner for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (822 reviews). Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (169 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ScriptRunner for Jira and Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Elements Connect (external data fields for Jira)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.