ScriptRunner for Jira vs Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira

Based on the data on this page, ScriptRunner for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira's 3.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira offers a free tier (Free) while ScriptRunner for Jira starts at From $0/yr. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

ScriptRunner for Jira has the larger user base (826 reviews vs 39), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ScriptRunner for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira's 39-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ScriptRunner for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is ScriptRunner for Jira or Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira cheaper?

Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). ScriptRunner for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, ScriptRunner for Jira or Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira?

ScriptRunner for Jira has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 826 reviews) compared to Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira (3.6★ from 39 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose ScriptRunner for Jira or Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira?

ScriptRunner for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 3.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, ScriptRunner for Jira or Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ScriptRunner for Jira has the deeper published review base (826 vs 39), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

ScriptRunner for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (826 reviews). Tricentis qTest Integration for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (39 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.