Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Time tracking for Jira. Time in Status, Cycle Time, Lead Time & Time Between Statuses. Identify bottlenecks, analyze team performance and sprint efficiency. Export to Excel, Power BI, and EazyBI. Use historical data to plan future workflow capacity.
| Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira | Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
The Revyz Command Center is an all-in-one platform for Jira Cloud data security and compliance. It automates backups and configuration migrations, analyzes drift, optimizes your site to save time, ensure compliance and saves you money.
| Metric | Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira | Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 268 | 19 |
| Active installs | 4,603+ | 954+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ From $0/yr | From $3.2/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) edges out Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira at From $0/yr, Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) at From $3.2/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira has the larger user base (268 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz); mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira's 268-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz)'s broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira audit • Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) audit
| — |
| Keyword | Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira | Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) |
|---|---|---|
| time | #9 | #298 |
Both Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira and Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) offer paid plans only. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira starts at From $0/yr; Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) starts at From $3.2/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 19 reviews) compared to Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira (4.8★ from 268 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira has more onboarding documentation maturity (268 reviews vs 19), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (268 reviews). Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (19 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira and Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Revyz Command Center for Jira (Configuration Backup Optimiz)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.