External Hooks by Reconquest vs Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence

Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence edges out External Hooks by Reconquest on rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence has the larger user base (442 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. External Hooks by Reconquest's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — External Hooks by Reconquest's 25-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, External Hooks by Reconquest or Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence?

Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 442 reviews) compared to External Hooks by Reconquest (4.7★ from 25 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose External Hooks by Reconquest or Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence?

Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, External Hooks by Reconquest or Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence has the deeper published review base (442 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

External Hooks by Reconquest typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (442 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between External Hooks by Reconquest and Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence?

Migration support varies by app and category. External Hooks by Reconquest and Table Filter, Charts & Spreadsheets for Confluence both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from External Hooks by Reconquest" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.