Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Configurable and flexible hook for Bitbucket that notifies Jenkins about code commits, pull requests and merges.
| Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket | ScriptRunner for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
ScriptRunner is the top scripting, automation and customisation app: Automate workflows, build custom fields and integrations with Groovy scripts and enhanced JQL. Execute admin and workflow functions without having to write a complete add-on.
| Metric | Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket | ScriptRunner for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 75 | ★ 826 |
| Active installs | 1,041+ | 35,011+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, ScriptRunner for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.6★ vs Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
ScriptRunner for Jira has the larger user base (826 reviews vs 75), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to ScriptRunner for Jira; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket's 75-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ScriptRunner for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket audit • ScriptRunner for Jira audit
| Keyword | Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket | ScriptRunner for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #272 | #106 |
| form | #382 | #213 |
ScriptRunner for Jira has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 826 reviews) compared to Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket (4.3★ from 75 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ScriptRunner for Jira holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ScriptRunner for Jira has the deeper published review base (826 vs 75), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (75 reviews). ScriptRunner for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (826 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket and ScriptRunner for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Webhook to Jenkins for Bitbucket" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.