Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create powerful, easy-to-use and secure diagrams. Top rated Jira diagramming solution since 2013
| draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The most secure way to share Git content in Confluence. Keep your code, diagrams, and docs safe, up-to-date, and accessible. Share files securely using OAuth or access tokens, automatic syncing. Embed PlantUML, Mermaid, Asciidoc and many more.
| Metric | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 350 | 22 |
| Active installs | 8,778+ | 1,082+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
draw.io Diagrams for Jira and Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams for Jira at From $0/yr, Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the larger user base (350 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: draw.io Diagrams for Jira audit • Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) audit
| Keyword | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #353 |
| form | Not ranked | #466 |
Both draw.io Diagrams for Jira and Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) offer paid plans only. draw.io Diagrams for Jira starts at From $0/yr; Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira (4.7★, 350 reviews) and Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) (4.8★, 22 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the deeper published review base (350 vs 22), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (350 reviews). Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. draw.io Diagrams for Jira and Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Git for Confluence (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.