Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
PlantUML and GraphViz diagrams and Latex Math formulas in Confluence pages. Diagrams from private GitHub and GitLab repositories with updatable viewer. Reuse flowcharts from Confluence, GitHub and GitLab using !include directive as templates.
| PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git | draw.io Diagrams for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Create powerful, easy-to-use and secure diagrams. Top rated Jira diagramming solution since 2013
| Metric | PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git | draw.io Diagrams for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 50 | ★ 349 |
| Active installs | 5,453+ | 9,240+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams for Jira is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.7★ vs PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git at From $0/yr, draw.io Diagrams for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the larger user base (349 reviews vs 50), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams for Jira; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git's 50-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams for Jira's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git audit • draw.io Diagrams for Jira audit
| Keyword | PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git | draw.io Diagrams for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #266 | Not ranked |
| form | #371 | Not ranked |
Both PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git and draw.io Diagrams for Jira offer paid plans only. PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git starts at From $0/yr; draw.io Diagrams for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
draw.io Diagrams for Jira has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 349 reviews) compared to PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git (4.3★ from 50 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; draw.io Diagrams for Jira is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace marketplace. draw.io Diagrams for Jira has more onboarding documentation maturity (349 reviews vs 50), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (50 reviews). draw.io Diagrams for Jira aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (349 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git and draw.io Diagrams for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PlantUML Diagrams for Confluence I UML, Flowchart, Git" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.