draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts vs Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM

Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM edges out draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr, Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 27), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's 1,204-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM cheaper?

Both draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM offer paid plans only. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr; Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM?

Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 27 reviews) compared to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM?

Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Awesome Custom Fields – Custom Fields for Jira & JSM?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 27), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.