draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts vs Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)

Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr, Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) at From $3/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 63), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)'s 63-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) cheaper?

Both draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) offer paid plans only. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr; Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) starts at From $3/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs) (4.4★ from 63 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Refined Sites for Confluence (Intranets, Documentation, KBs)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 63), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.