AppRanks verdict
Generated from live data on this pageBased on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace merchants — 4.8★ vs Composition Tabs for Confluence's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr, Composition Tabs for Confluence at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,202 reviews vs 77), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Composition Tabs for Confluence's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Composition Tabs for Confluence's 77-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts audit • Composition Tabs for Confluence audit