Side-by-side comparison
Create secure, user-friendly diagrams with the top-rated diagramming solution since 2013 and one of the first major apps on Forge.
Time Tracking Fields lets you create multiple time tracking fields per issue. Add separate QA, SLA, contract or baseline estimates, all fully searchable in JQL, dashboards and automation, without scripts or fragile workarounds.
| Metric | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | Time Tracking Fields for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.2k | 4 |
| Active installs | 62,328+ | 133+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
On the measured data here, draw.io Diagrams leads on more dimensions (3 vs 0). Pick Time Tracking Fields for Jira if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Listed entry pricing: draw.io Diagrams at From $0/yr, Time Tracking Fields for Jira at From $0/yr. See the plans table for what each tier includes.
Built only from the Atlassian Marketplace listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts audit • Time Tracking Fields for Jira audit
| Field | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | Time Tracking Fields for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
|---|
| Keyword | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | Time Tracking Fields for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #65 |
| forms | #146 | Not ranked |
| form | #255 | Not ranked |
Both draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Time Tracking Fields for Jira offer a free plan. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts lists no paid plan with a published price; Time Tracking Fields for Jira lists no paid plan with a published price. Prices are as listed on the Atlassian Marketplace; check what each tier includes in the Pricing section above.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Time Tracking Fields for Jira (4.7★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (1,204 vs 4).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the Atlassian Marketplace data. What it can show: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has 1,204 published reviews; Time Tracking Fields for Jira has 4 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Time Tracking Fields for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Time Tracking Fields for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.