Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo vs draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts

Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr, Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo at From $1/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 200), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo's 200-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo cheaper?

Both draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo offer paid plans only. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr; Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo (3.7★ from 200 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Capacity Planner - Jira Team & Resource Management | Tempo?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 200), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.