Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create secure, user-friendly diagrams with the top-rated diagramming solution since 2013 and one of the first major apps on Forge.
| draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
See exactly where Jira workflows stall. Timepiece turns issue history into Time in Status reports plus Cycle Time and Lead Time metrics your team can act on, exportable to Excel, Power BI, and eazyBI. Built for data-driven Agile teams.
| Metric | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.2k | 269 |
| Active installs | 62,629+ | 4,527+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $0/yr | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira are evenly matched on rating (4.8★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts at From $0/yr, Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 269), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts audit • Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira audit
| Keyword | draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts | Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| time | Not ranked | #9 |
| forms | #146 | Not ranked |
| form | #255 | Not ranked |
Both draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira offer paid plans only. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr; Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts (4.8★, 1,204 reviews) and Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira (4.8★, 269 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 269), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,204 reviews). Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (269 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Timepiece - Time in Status for Jira" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.