draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts vs External Hooks by Reconquest

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts edges out External Hooks by Reconquest on rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. External Hooks by Reconquest's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — External Hooks by Reconquest's 25-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or External Hooks by Reconquest?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to External Hooks by Reconquest (4.7★ from 25 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or External Hooks by Reconquest?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or External Hooks by Reconquest?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,204 reviews). External Hooks by Reconquest typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and External Hooks by Reconquest?

Migration support varies by app and category. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts and External Hooks by Reconquest both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from External Hooks by Reconquest" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.