Mria CRM vs External Share for Jira

Mria CRM edges out External Share for Jira on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing differs significantly: External Share for Jira at From $1/yr vs Mria CRM at From $2/yr (Mria CRM is roughly 2.0x the entry-tier cost of External Share for Jira). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Mria CRM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — External Share for Jira's 39-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mria CRM's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Mria CRM or External Share for Jira cheaper?

Both Mria CRM and External Share for Jira offer paid plans only. Mria CRM starts at From $2/yr; External Share for Jira starts at From $1/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Mria CRM or External Share for Jira?

Mria CRM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to External Share for Jira (4.7★ from 39 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Mria CRM or External Share for Jira?

Mria CRM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Mria CRM or External Share for Jira?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. External Share for Jira has the deeper published review base (39 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Mria CRM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). External Share for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (39 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Mria CRM and External Share for Jira?

Migration support varies by app and category. Mria CRM and External Share for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mria CRM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.