| Mria CRM | Connector for Salesforce & Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Connect Salesforce with Jira. Associate, synchronize Salesforce cases, contacts, accounts, etc. with Jira issues.
| Metric | Mria CRM | Connector for Salesforce & Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 25 | ★ 236 |
| Active installs | 338+ | 3,384+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | From $2/yr | ★ From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Based on the data on this page, Mria CRM is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 5.0★ vs Connector for Salesforce & Jira's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Mria CRM at From $2/yr, Connector for Salesforce & Jira at From $0/yr. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Connector for Salesforce & Jira has the larger user base (236 reviews vs 25), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mria CRM's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Mria CRM; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Connector for Salesforce & Jira's 236-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mria CRM's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mria CRM audit • Connector for Salesforce & Jira audit
Both Mria CRM and Connector for Salesforce & Jira offer paid plans only. Mria CRM starts at From $2/yr; Connector for Salesforce & Jira starts at From $0/yr. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mria CRM has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 25 reviews) compared to Connector for Salesforce & Jira (4.7★ from 236 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mria CRM holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Connector for Salesforce & Jira has the deeper published review base (236 vs 25), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mria CRM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (25 reviews). Connector for Salesforce & Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (236 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mria CRM and Connector for Salesforce & Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mria CRM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.