Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence vs EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence and EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence or EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence (5.0★, 53 reviews) and EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) (5.0★, 34 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence or EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence or EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence has the deeper published review base (53 vs 34), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?

Single Sign On (SSO) via OAuth and OpenID for Confluence typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (53 reviews). EasySSO for Confluence (Kerberos/NTLM/HTTP headers/SAML SSO) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (34 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.